3 ways how context gauges social media campaign success

3 ways how context gauges social media campaign success

A cartoon of an orange alien saying to a yellow alien "The results of our twitter campaign include 23 retweets, 7 new followers, and 2 favourites". The yellow alien asks "So was our campaign successful" to which the orange replies "uh, yes. Um, let me explain".

There is no set formula for determining the success of a social media campaign. Something along the lines of “if you get over X number of retweets or reach on Facebook, then you were successful” doesn’t apply to the social media campaigns because each has its own unique goals (you are thinking about the goals first, right?).

The yellow alien says Meh. Only 23 people retweeted? Epic fail. The orange alien replies Ok, so only 23 people retweeted (including our employees) but 4 of the retweeters were from the industry, 7 were influencers, 3 were journalists, a few were regular engaged followers, and 1 person wants to blog about us.

It’s hard not to get hung up on the numbers. The higher the number, the higher success, right? Using the example in this post’s comic, earning 23 retweets can be disappointing but doing a little research can raise your spirits. Context is everything. After all, perhaps:

  • your niche area is super small
  • you are just starting out on the social media front
  • your audience isn’t on the networks you’re targeting
  • you haven’t tossed out traditional media who can talk about you on their social networks, right?
  • your audience is missing your stuff – social media is very noisy now

And any number of other reasons. With proper context, low analytics may not mean failure (but you may need to work a little harder or do some refining). One of my infographic campaigns reached over 17,000 people on Facebook. Would 17,000 be a low number for a well established, highly engaged brand such as Disney, Starbucks, Harley Davidson when they are used to getting a lot higher numbers? 

Who did the sharing/liking/commenting/etc.?

No matter the social network, it’s important to look at who did the sharing of your content. Who wrote the comments? Who did the liking? Who did the favouriting? At my last workplace, finding out who did what helped my team tremendously with understanding who followed us, what their needs were, and most importantly, build a better win-win relationship. After all, social media is for being social. Knowing all this helped us tailor and target our posts in a more effective manner.

Quantity is good (the more the better, right?) but never overlook the nuggets of gold in the qualitative stuff. By taking the time to identify the who, we learned that we were being followed by key industry partners, journalists, and influencers. This enabled us to be more proactive in thanking them for sharing or replying to their comments, and thus, build a relationship.

A cartoon of a yellow alien saying Oh that’s good! An orange alien replies It is! And we’ve learned a great deal about our audience’s needs by simply reading their comments and interacting with them. This will help us refine our future campaigns.

What did the audience say to you?

You can learn a lot about your audience from what they write in their comments. Back at my previous workplace, our Facebook audience revealed themselves to be former clients and former employees. Along with helping us tailor future campaigns, this also gave us insight into how much those who no longer had a need to still follow us still wanted to engage with us (also a pretty good indication of a respected brand).

Audience comments, private messages, emails, etc. can also reveal to us:

  • new product or service features that would be useful to them
  • product or service features that aren’t useful to them (or even working)
  • their thoughts about what we posted
  • repeat commenters are your ambassadors (or trolls if they are always really, really disruptive)
  • give us the chance to make things right when we goof things up (replying to audience comments will let them feel like their voice is being heard)

A cartoon of an orange alien saying and according to our web analytics, a chunk of the social audience isn’t doing what we hope they would do. Our website seems to suck. A yellow alien thinks to himself My brain hurts.

What did the analytics tell you?

Keep an eye not just on the native social analytics but your website analytics, too. And intranet – your employees are your biggest brand ambassadors! Look at the traffic flow. Are people actually going to your website/landing page from your social media campaign’s call of actions (if applicable)?

Are any steps to the final goal being missed due to unoptimized pages or worse, 404 errors? This is were quantitative really starts to matter – if your campaign goal was to, say, increase sales, well, have sales increased? If your campaign was to increase registrations – yup, you guessed it – has the number of registrations increased?

Looking at web analytics can also reveal to us:

  • keywords the audience and visitors are using to land on your pages
  • most accessed pages (you’d be amazed at which pages you thought were important to your audience but aren’t)
  • how long visitors spend on a page
  • and lots, lots more

The more tools you incorporate into your website, intranet, and social media strategy, the more you should include their native analytics in your overall monitoring. Together they can provide a holistic profile(s) of your audience’s behaviours and effectiveness of your digital channels.

An illustration of two aliens looking at a report. One of the aliens is saying "Wow! Lots of audience insight. This is gold!"
I’ve only scratched the surface of determining the success of a social media campaign. Just try not to overlook or undermine the value in audience insight. I know it’s not as fun as strategizing and creating the content itself for most people, but it determines the success of your work flat out. What other criteria do you use to determine campaign success?

 

 

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *